Double time
#2
Posted 19 February 2012 - 02:40 AM
Good luck if you cut at 130bpm though!
#5
Posted 19 February 2012 - 10:57 AM
I find though, that speed boosters can be a double-edged sword. You can get caught in a race to be as fast as possible, instead of taking your time with each new tempo so you're not slopping your way to 130 bpm
#6
Posted 19 February 2012 - 02:17 PM
I do not say this is the best way to do it, it's just how i do it.
#7
Posted 20 February 2012 - 01:27 PM
#8
Posted 20 February 2012 - 01:57 PM
If you can't cut over electro (120 bpm or so) then learn that and try to make the natural progression to doubletime. Much, but not all, of speed cutting is illusion. Certain patterns just sound fast. The joe cooley scratch is a perfect example of that. Other scratches, like chirps, are actually fast, and sound fast, but aren't so diffficult at double-time speeds.
But yeah, the big advantage is not just being able to cut fast, it's being able to go from single time to double time, using triplet patterns, etc. It's all about variation to keep things interesting. If you just cut super-fast for 3 minutes its going to sound boring after about 30 seconds.
#9
Posted 21 February 2012 - 04:15 AM
Hint: Instead of trying to do this constantly over every beat of a 4/4 measure, try just fitting your notes over the 1 of a 4/4 beat. It's often times easier to lessen the work load when trying to meet speed challenges in the early stages.
#10
Posted 22 February 2012 - 01:58 AM
Jam Burglar, on 20 February 2012 - 01:57 PM, said:
If you can't cut over electro (120 bpm or so) then learn that and try to make the natural progression to doubletime. Much, but not all, of speed cutting is illusion. Certain patterns just sound fast. The joe cooley scratch is a perfect example of that. Other scratches, like chirps, are actually fast, and sound fast, but aren't so diffficult at double-time speeds.
But yeah, the big advantage is not just being able to cut fast, it's being able to go from single time to double time, using triplet patterns, etc. It's all about variation to keep things interesting. If you just cut super-fast for 3 minutes its going to sound boring after about 30 seconds.
cosign. so if you cut double time over electro, youre cutting 240 bpm? in theory that sounds right, but does anyone actually cut 240 bpm? or is there a selection of cuts that sound complicated and suit this style? i have such a difficult time cutting to electro for that exact reason: im trying to fit in double time combos and it just falls to pieces.
#11
Posted 22 February 2012 - 01:12 PM
Unseen, on 22 February 2012 - 01:58 AM, said:
cosign. so if you cut double time over electro, youre cutting 240 bpm? in theory that sounds right, but does anyone actually cut 240 bpm? or is there a selection of cuts that sound complicated and suit this style? i have such a difficult time cutting to electro for that exact reason: im trying to fit in double time combos and it just falls to pieces.
If you look at it like a flow thing (cutting at that pace for an extended period), I can't think of anybody cutting doubletime over electro. If you go back to the mid-late 80s there are lots of examples of DJs doing simple cuts over electro, pacing it so that it sounds fast (Joe Cooley, Cash Money, Jazzy Jeff, etc.). The Skratch Piklz took that style and added advanced techniques to the mix (crabs, flares) and then by the mid 90s seemed to be trying to push things faster and faster. The next natural progression was to go back to a slower beat, but to cut faster over it (doubltime). You'd think it might be a matter of just doing everything twice as fast, but much of it is how you phrase. Some stuff in true doubletime is so crazy taxing that you almost never hear it. For example, you don't hear a lot of transforms at that pace.
#12
Posted 22 February 2012 - 04:00 PM
Jam Burglar, on 22 February 2012 - 01:12 PM, said:
You'd think it might be a matter of just doing everything twice as fast, but much of it is how you phrase. Some stuff in true doubletime is so crazy taxing that you almost never hear it.
yeah this is how i imagined it to be. i cant get my head around how to make the cuts i have in my arsenal to sound right in this application.
#15
Posted 17 May 2012 - 08:58 AM
New to this, on 17 May 2012 - 03:26 AM, said:
that would be 4 1 click flares. someone correct me if im wrong. well actually to make it sound aesthetically correct, it would be 3 ending with an open foward scratch.
so it would sound like [with "ahhh"]: wikka wikka wikka ahhh. with this i mean the complete set in isolation and not in a phrase or sentence. if its part of a sentence (with continued cuts), you can do 4. the end of the 4th 1 click flare (wik-ka) just spills over into the next 1 bar measure.
#16
Posted 17 May 2012 - 03:12 PM
Just like drumming (real with sticks not on a turntable), climb in BPM is just as important and slowing down in BPM to get your muscles used to speeding up and slowing down. (Instead of getting used to starting slow and building speed) So when I'd reach a threshold of fatigue/comfort at high BPM, I'd take a break and then at that high BPM practice doing it at half and regular timing. Then nudge my way down in BPM.
After getting ok with that, I'd test it on different beats at different BPMs and usually by then I seem to have a grasp of being comfortable with the technique at different timings and speeds.
#20
Posted 16 July 2012 - 02:11 PM
Practice, practice, practice & all that.
Reply to this topic
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










